![]() Use beyond personal research is restricted unless permission is obtained from the copyright holder(s). Restrictions on Use: Most of the photographs in this collection are copyrighted by news organizations. Restrictions on Access: A small group of photographs related to the Peter Griffiths case is restricted. ![]() To find specific names or subject terms in the listing below, click on the "Edit" menu of your browser and choose "Find." Type a name or other word in the "Find" box and hit enter. See also the Borowitz Crime-related postcard collection for additional images associated with crime history. The bulk of the collection is comprised of 20th-century press photos from various news organizations, however, other types of photographs, such as cartes-de-visite and other 19th-century formats, are also present. Scope and Content:This collection, donated by Albert and Helen Borowitz, contains over 500 photographs related to various criminal cases. Prepared by Cara Gilgenbach and Dyani Scheuerman, November 2002 revised February 2012 Last updated: January 2020Įxtent: 2.75 cubic feet (5 half-size record storage boxes + 1 flat oversize box) All rights reserved.Borowitz Collection: Crime Photographs collection ![]() The attorney general said the case should serve as an example for other nonprofits to use their donations for intended purposes and not misrepresenting donors.Ĭopyright 2023 WAVE. “Despite his 15 minutes of fame in the Netflix documentary Tiger King and Tiger King 2, Stark was still required to abide by the law – just like any other citizen,” Attorney General Todd Rokita said in a release. However, an appeals court stated that there was evidence proving Stark routinely used WIN funds to pay for personal expenses, including credit card debt, personal property improvements, and taking equipment and animals purchased in Wildlife in Need to Oklahoma while he lived there. Stark filed an appeal for the order, claiming that he was entitled to use “the proceeds of WIN to handle personal obligations, such as utilities for the properties.” 10, 2020, and the Board of Directors voted to dissolve Wildlife in Need ten days later. Indiana’s Attorney General filed a complaint with intent to remove Stark from a directorial position at Wildlife in Need, require him to return the misappropriated funds and to prevent Stark and Wildlife in Need from obtaining or exhibiting exotic or native animals.Ĭustody of the animals within Wildlife in Need was transferred to the Indianapolis Zoological Society on Sept. ![]() Several lawsuits were filed against Stark and Wildlife in Need for treatment of animals used during Wildlife in Need’s “Tiger Baby Playtime” events and causing dozens of violations of animal welfare regulations and standards. In May 2022, an order was issued by a Marion County court to distribute assets of Wildlife in Need after a trial found the nonprofit had been using funds for Stark’s personal use and failed to notify a board of directors that Stark intended to transfer assets to a new business in Oklahoma. (WAVE) - Tim Stark, known for his appearance in Netflix’s Tiger King documentary and as the owner of Clark County’s Wildlife in Need roadside zoo, is being found liable for misappropriated funds from the nonprofit organization.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |